Home > 
Knowledge and Insight > M&A Issues
« 2 3 4 5 6 »

All Articles


Time to Combine With Another Financial Adviser? Maybe Not.

Added on September 2015 in M&A Issues
1 visitor like this article | Viewed 92 times | 0 comment

Summary: Some advisers dream of acquiring another practice. Their wish list may include doubling their assets under management and creating a regional or even national presence.Such things are possible if an acquisition goes well. Not every deal is a winner, though. Firm cultures may not mesh, the paperwork may be overwhelming and clients may leave, taking assets with them.

Still Going Strong, Dynasty Adds $250 Million Team in Pennsylvania

Added on September 2015 in M&A Issues
1 visitor like this article | Viewed 95 times | 0 comment

Summary: With about 30 firms now a part of Dynasty Financial, the firm sees no end in sight as it added a Wells Fargo team to its network on Monday.

Who's the Boss: Choosing the Right Successor for Your Business

Added on August 2015 in M&A Issues
1 visitor like this article | Viewed 87 times | 0 comment

Summary: Working with a mergers and acquisitions specialist will help to achieve a good deal and a smooth transition. They’ll assist in valuations, finding buyers and doing their due diligence. They’re also somewhat of a hand holder for those selling a business for the first time, who likely have many questions and concerns.

Bronfman E.L. Rothschild acquires Highline to create $3.6B firm

Added on August 2015 in M&A Issues
1 visitor like this article | Viewed 107 times | 0 comment

Summary: In the latest deal between billion-dollar-plus registered investment advisers, Bronfman E.L. Rothschild said Tuesday it had acquired Highline Wealth Management, creating a combined $3.6 billion firm.

Considering growing through M&A? Don't call it a 'tuck-in'

Added on August 2015 in M&A Issues
1 visitor like this article | Viewed 117 times | 0 comment

Summary: Given the massive increase of merger and acquisition activity in wealth management, and understanding the complexity and unique nature of each of these transactions, we have to ask ourselves one very important question: How did our industry ever decide upon using the words “tuck-in” when referring to acquiring someone's business?

« 2 3 4 5 6 »

Your session has expired!

To continue, please log in again.

Your session is about to expire!

You will be logged off in seconds.

Do you want to continue your session?